Thanks Bob. 300mm actually. If I had had the 35mm on the camera I would have 
gone lower and gotten more of its face, but the minimum focusing distance on 
the 300mm would have forced me into the water to get that perspective and I 
didn't want to get wet right then. Yeah, I know, a truly dedicated photographer 
wouldn't worry about such minor obstacles . . .

On Jul 24, 2013, at 10:12 AM, Bob Sullivan wrote:

> Wow Stan, that's really close up!
> Were you using the 35mm Macro?
> Nice and crisp.
> Regards,  Bob S.
> 
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 8:15 AM, Stan Halpin
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> An addition to my on-going Long Lake 2013 gallery, this is a shot of one of 
>> Ann's favorite critters. Last featured performing hazardous duty as a escort 
>> to a loon, today we see the intrepid drone at rest on the dock . . .
>> 
>> http://photos.stanhalpin.com/p769975649/h6f441a6f#h6f441a6f
>> 
>> stan
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>> follow the directions.
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to