Pat, I'm thinking that I have the same bag as you. Is it a bit more like a briefcase with an opening lid to see all? I really like the bag but cannot put the 67 body with prism in the way you are supposed to put 35mm cameras. It is too tall. Or do you let a big lump sit there. Other than that I quite like the design of the bag. I use it for 35mm stuff.
Bruce Dayton Sunday, March 31, 2002, 1:15:24 PM, you wrote: PW> I was using the small bag that was thrown in on the deal when I bought my 6x7, then I bought another lens, etc., etc. The other day I pulled out the Lowepro Omni Pro bag I hadn't used in a long PW> time, and it's perfect. It holds the camera, 105/2.4, 165/2.8, extension tubes, 2x converter, Metz flash, and has lots of room left over. It even has quick-release loops to carry a tripod. PW> The thing I really like is that I can put the camera in the bag no matter what lens is on it, including the 165 plus 2x converter. With many bags, you have to take off the long lens to put the PW> camera away. That really annoys me, especially if I'm using that lens repeatedly. PW> Pat White PW> - PW> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, PW> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to PW> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
