With the planned obsolence and high cost of repair so prevelant in many of
todays products, cameras included, it seems like functional product
longevity is not as big a factor as it once was.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
----- Original Message -----
From: "Darren Addy" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Peso Looking up-looking down
Another point of failure? Sure, sort of like electric windows, air
conditioning and other options on cars. On balance, it should be up to
the consumer whether he wishes to have them or not. Sales figures
would determine whether it was worthwhile for a company to offer the
option or now. It would certainly be one way of separating your
flagship product from the more basic lines (something that Pentax
seems to have a problem with, ATTM. The K-500 is hardly different from
the K-50, for instance).
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 11:23 AM, P.J. Alling
<[email protected]> wrote:
Well, convenient as articulating screens are, they just add another point
of
failure to an already complex device. I can understand why a
manufacturer
would forgo making models with this feature.
On 7/30/2013 12:19 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
THIS is the reason for articulating LCD screens. I think that if
camera companies are going to make duplicate models except for the
anti-alias filter then they could also make duplicate models
with/without an articulating LCD screen.
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 10:16 AM, David J Brooks <[email protected]>
wrote:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17480450
The photographer is lying on the ground looking up i assume to try and
get all of the CN Tower in the back ground.
Dave
--
Documenting Life in Rural Ontario.
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
York Region, Ontario, Canada
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
