I was just wondering what you were getting at because it almost made sense.
On 8/22/2013 8:12 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Damn spell checker. I'm not imposing a deadline.
Paul via phone
On Aug 22, 2013, at 7:36 PM, Paul Stenquist <[email protected]> wrote:
On Aug 22, 2013, at 5:20 PM, Tom C <[email protected]> wrote:
Paul Stenquist wrote:
I'm always mystified in regard to the urgency of FF. My camera works great. If I
were a landscape photographer shooting wall-size murals I might think otherwise,
but I don't plan on > going there.
Paul, this my cheeky, yet respectful response, and I know I don't need
to explain the benefits of a FF sensor to you.
If/when Pentax releases a FF body, and you purchase it, I'll pose the
same question back to you. :)
Yes, I'll probably buy it, and there are some benefits to a 24 x 36 sensor (my
camera has a full frame), but the K-5 images are tough to beat. Just ask the
photo editors at the New York Times. I would like a larger sensor, but I'm
certainly not imposing a decline and losing sleep over it. That's just silly.
Paul
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
--
A newspaper is a device for making the ignorant more ignorant, and the crazy,
crazier.
- H.L.Mencken
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
