Thanks Matthew. I should hav thought of doing this. And you are absolutely right. This could not be done with the other recordning, though.
Regards Jens Treat others as you would like to be treated yourself. On Aug 24, 2013 05:33 "Matthew Hunt" <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 1:15 PM, Jens <[email protected]> wrote: > > Please look at and comment: > > http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/sets/72157635199289372/ > > I looked at the 8391 pair, and I don't think the two programs > actually > disagree on the azimuth. Here they are overlaid: > > http://i.imgur.com/uW7NiYn.jpg > > They do differ in the depicted angle of view--is that supposed to > accurately show the field of view from the EXIF? If so, maybe one is > not applying the crop factor correctly? > > The two programs also have different imagery, in which the towers are > photographed from different angles. I think that also makes it harder > to compare them visually. > > In terms of the absolute error of the O-GPS1 azimuth, I'm not sure > what degree of accuracy is to be expected. The electronic compass in > my iPhone seems fairly erratic. Rob's point is well taken, as > high-voltage lines can affect compass readings, as could metallic > objects, magnets, etc. in your vicinity. > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
