OOps, frogot the 24mm. Bob S. On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Bob Sullivan <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, that's why Pentax made primes of 85mm, 100mm, 120mm, 135mm,150mm, > and 200mm. > From 50.mm down they made 40mm, 35mm, 30mm, 28mm, 20mm, and 15mm. > Regards, Bob S. > > On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 2:06 PM, John <[email protected]> wrote: >> Or change to a prime with an appropriate focal length. >> >> We were required to print "full frame" my first semester in school, just to >> demonstrate we had not inadvertently composed an image that cropped elements >> of the scene out of the image frame. >> >> On 8/24/2013 1:11 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote: >>> >>> Cropping was a lot more exacting in the days before zooms. >>> You didn't just zoom in or out to get your cropping right. >>> You had to zoom with your feet. >>> Regards, Bob S. >>> >>> On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 12:53 AM, steve harley <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> on 2013-08-23 21:34 Matthew Hunt wrote >>>> >>>>> On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 11:26 PM, John <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I've never heard of "get it exact in the camera" before. >>>>>> >>>>>> I've always heard "get it right in camera" ... not the same thing. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I sure have. There are absolutely no-crop fetishists on the >>>>> Internet... and there were in the film days, too (showing the edges of >>>>> the frame as "proof"). >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> some did tremendous work within that constraint; while i'm not a purist >>>> about it myself, being close to someone who was (in the 1960s), i think >>>> it >>>> offers a certain simplicity - first thought, best thought >>>> >>>> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions.
-- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
