I used a Nikon Coolpix 5700 with an EVF, for evidence photography, years ago and in my opinion it was a great camera for static image capture but wasn't one to use for any sort of dynamic capture - there was a noticeable time delay between pushing the shutter release and the actual image capture - giving you the image that occurred after the one you wanted. Does this delay still exist in modern EVFs?
-----Original Message----- >From: Tom C <[email protected]> >Subject: Re: Which second party camera system do you like? Mini-survey > >> Years ago somebody bought a digital P&S with a digital viewfinder. >> I was instantly turned off by the lines on the screen. >> Tell me it's better now??? >> Regards, Bob S. > >Hi Bob, > >You answered part of it yourself. :) This is today, that was years >ago. No lines. > >I was mildly blown away by the IQ of the NEX-7 EVF. > >Some will whine about noise in low light, but then they should also >whine that they can't see a heck of a lot through an optical VF when >light levels are low. If anything, at very low light levels an EVF at >least gives you a representation of what's being imaged, where with >optical, one is almost blind. > >Take a look through a NEX-6 or 7 EVF. It's a 2.3 million pixel image. >That's more than twice the pixel count of the LCD monitor. > >Tom C. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
