Okay grasshopper. I'm in favor of fun:-) Paul via phone
On Sep 19, 2013, at 6:24 PM, "Steve Cottrell" <[email protected]> wrote: > On 19/9/13, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed: > >> Grasshopper might understand, but I don't. Why waste good glass on >> cameras with small sensors? And I suspect modern Pentax glass is better >> than most of those lenses. > > The CMOS sensor in the XE-1 is an APS-C at 23.6 X 15.6 mm) 4896 X 3264 > pixels with no anti-aliasing filter. > > I would rather it was 36x24 but I'll compromise based on the quality of > build and design, which I admire. > > If it said Pentax on the front I'd be delirious - as it is Fujifilm is > not only as good as but quickly becoming highly regarded for their > hardware. I have to say with what I've seen so far, I'm pretty impressed. > > Plus it's fun :) > > -- > > > Cheers, > Cotty > > > ___/\__ Broadcast, Corporate, > || (O) | Web Video Production > ---------- <www.seeingeye.tv> > _____________________________ > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
