Hi, Paul.  Nice description.  Do you know if the B-22 cold light is still available?  
Expensive?  I, too, have one of those old stalwarts.

> -----Original Message-----
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Paul Stenquist
> Sent: April 04, 2002 11:18 AM
>  
> A cold light head is basically a fluorescent light source that is
> positioned above the negative. Some are fairly elaborate grids. Others
> are merely round tubes positioned in a white dome. The advantages
> include less heat (which prevents negative popping) and a diffuse light
> source that is less likely to accent small specs of dust on the
> negative. Some would say that the prints appear less sharp. To my eye,
> they only seem to have nicer transitions from one shade of grey to the
> next. The grain is still visible and appears sharp under a magnifier,
> but it doesn't seem to be accentuated to the degree it does with a
> condenser enlarger. I prefer the look of a cold light print. Some do
> not. 
>    The cold light on my 35mm enlarger is a zone VI unit. The cold light
> on my Omega D2 is the original Omegalite version. The Zone VI appears to
> be a somewhat complex device with a separate power unit and two power
> cords. The Omegalite is just the round tube in a dome as described
> above. Both produce evenly exposed prints. If there's a difference, it's
> indetectable to me.
> Paul Stenquist
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Reply via email to