In fact I've been researching a medium format path. Deep dynamic range and the medium format look both intrigue me.
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 1:34 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[email protected]> wrote: > Not worth debating as it is completely beside the point of my statements > about quality photos. > > Of course there are times when you need more pixels, just like in film days > there were certainly times when 35mm film was inadequate. If your subject and > print requirements demand it, stop wasting time with APS-C and move up the > ladder. That's why I have three digital capture formats and cameras from 5 to > 18 Mpixels at my disposal. Next up would be a digital back for the > Hasselblad, but I haven't seen the need yet. > > Godfrey > >> On Sep 23, 2013, at 7:42 AM, Bruce Walker <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> No, I mean proportion as in "a relationship between things or parts of >> things with respect to comparative magnitude". Magnitude by itself is >> just size. Proportion says, I have a large space so a large image >> superimposed here will look better then a small one. > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- -bmw -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
