On Sep 26, 2013, at 5:49 PM, Bill wrote: > On 26/09/2013 12:32 PM, Darren Addy wrote: >> Other than the "K-3"that looks EXACTLY like my K-5II. You would think >> there would be SOMETHING different about it. > Look at your K5II compared face on to the K7. They had a very successful > chassis in the K7, and they pretty much plonked the K5 right into it, I'm not > seeing a whole lot of reason why the K3 should "look different", and in fact > I would be quite happy if it was the same chassis, as that might also mean > same battery and same battery grip >> (The K-5II also sold in >> kits with that lens, the 18-135mm). I would bet that image is just >> "re-purposed" to put it nicely. > Every DSLR Pentax has made has been sold with a kit lens. Why would this be > any different? > > bill >
A babblefish translation of a portion of the source page: Unless you see the image in the k-3 body differ with some k-5 II in fine detail, but overall the k-5 II very similar is like. That unlike k-5 II character of the shape of pentaprism, AF auxiliary light lamp area, shape, shape of lens detachable button, SR change to Golden, and then, in the shape of the part under the logo of "k-3' (English) stan -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
