>But, if you were only allowed one lens to go with a K-5, the 16-50 will >probably get you better pictures more of the time than any other lens >that I can think of. > >Assuming, of course, you get one that works. > > >-- >Larry Colen
Interesting thoughts. That's the reason I got the FA35/2. Really sharp and being the effective "normal" lens I can shot it and not care too much about having to crop. My most-used lens is the 18-55WR. Would like to see some comparisons between that and the 16-50. Perhaps I'll go there next week and do so. There have been times that I forsook zoom and just used the 35/2 and didn't worry about cropping. But that's in a controlled environment. When in NYC and shooting dancers indoors I use the 18-55. Also ... Did Tokina ever come out with the 12-24 in Pentax? I've not found one yet. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
