On Nov 2, 2013, at 8:13 PM, Attila Boros wrote:

>> On Nov 2, 2013, at 3:01 PM, Stan Halpin wrote:
>> 
>> on the K-3 in addition to Distortion Correction and Lateral Aberration 
>> Correction, they have added "Peripheral Illumination Correction"
> 
> Is this working in RAW mode or just with jpegs?
> 

Not clear to me. The language is similar to what is in the K-5 manual, except 
for the added vignetting correction.  But I haven't done anything with this on 
the K-5.

>From the K-3 manual: "When the file format is set to RAW or RAW+ the 
>correction information is saved as a RAW file parameter and you can select 
>[ON] or [OFF] when developing the RAW images. For the RAW Development 
>function, [Color Fringe Corrector] can also be set."

The RAW development in Playback mode allows you to take a captured RAW and 
Develop the image as a JPEG i n the camera, with many selectable parameters 
from JPEG quality and size to use of digital filters to use of these 
lens-correction features. So, I don't think the lens corrections affect JPEGs 
unless you selectively use them that way during in-camera development. 
What happens to the "RAW file parameter" info once the image is downloaded? 
Beats me. I assume the Pentax software takes advantage of it, I don't know if 
LR does and if this is over and above the LR lens correction profiles. I never 
paid attention before since I never have seen (or had pointed out to me) 
evidence of distortion or lateral chromatic aberration and so I just passed on 
by this in the K-5 (and earlier?) manuals. It just happened to catch my eye 
while going through the K-3.

BTW, the K-3 manual is incredibly easier to read. The same information is 
presented in a much more concise straightforward manner. E.g., there is an 
HDR-capture function on the K-5 (and earlier?) which is similar to the K-3, 
though the K-3 allows user setting of the EV range of the 3 exposures. And I 
have been experimenting with HDR via bracketing and post-process software. Any 
thought of using the in-camera HDR was squashed by all of the provisos and 
footnotes and limitations. The K-3 is cleaner. Within a month I may be 
hollering for more details, more info, more footnotes, but as a getting-started 
manual the K-3 looks about right to me.

stan


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to