I shot with the 200/3.5 Vivitar for nearly 20 years and it served me very well. It was a darn good lens, and I made a lot of money with it. Many thousands of dollars in fact. But it's entertaining to make fun of some of those old screw mount lenses. I gave mine to a newby photographer, who is still getting a lot of use out of it. Paul
James Adams wrote: > > Steve, > I have athe same lens in front of me, but much newer. In fact, I've got the > Vivitar 135/f2.8, and 200/f3.5 Pentax scew-mount lenses. They are both quite > nice. and the 135/f2.8 cost me about $30 CDN, and the 200/f3.5 $35 CDN, and > are like new. > James > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
