http://www.imaging-resource.com/IMCOMP/COMPS01.HTM
You can compare images here. The Q7 is noticeably sharper and resolves more fine detail than the original Q. There wasn't hardly much difference between the Q and Q10 in terms of IQ. It higher ISOs the Q7 gets probably a stop better. On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 8:11 PM, Darren Addy <[email protected]> wrote: > Well, before the 08 the highest priced Q lenses have a street price of > $296. I would expect the 08 to settle close to an actual selling price > of $350 before very long. > > By the way, we've been interested to see the K-3 vs K-5/ii/iis image > quality. Can anybody point me to a good comparison of the same for Q7 > vs Q10? > > On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 6:04 PM, Brian Walters <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Quoting Darren Addy <[email protected]>: >> >>> >>> http://www.us.ricoh-imaging.com/camera-lenses/PENTAX_08_Wide_Zoom_Lens_for_Q-Series_Cameras#!product-highlights >>> >> >> Interesting, but my Q system is only used intermittently when I don't feel >> like lugging the K-5 around, so 500 bucks is a bit hard to justify. >> >> >> >>> 49mm filter diameter (!) >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Cheers >> >> Brian >> >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> Brian Walters >> Western Sydney Australia >> http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/ >> >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. > > > > -- > Nothing is sure but death and Pentaxes. > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
