Paul, I would very much appreciate a screenshot or any other way I can see and examine where it shows how you recovered these overexposed shots.
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 5:45 PM, Paul Stenquist <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Nov 13, 2013, at 9:49 AM, Bill <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 12/11/2013 11:20 PM, Boris Liberman wrote: >> >>> >>> Not trying to sound pessimistic or anything, but DR is the most >>> important aspect to me. So I get to keep my K-5 for now. >>> >> Out of curiosity, do you know what the DR of the K3 is (I don't)? >> >> The K5 is something like 14 stops at base ISO, which is something like 8 >> stops more than most people will encounter in real life picture taking >> situations. >> Extreme DR perhaps isn't as important as you think it needs to be, and the >> DR of the K3 seems ample, at least at lower ISOs. >> >> bill >> > I've wondered about this concern over DR myself. Compared to the slide film > we all used to shoot, modern digital cameras have a huge range. I don't > recall ever running out of latitude. (I grossly overexposed a white interior > on a car shoot last summer when brain fade set in, but was easily able to > retrieve detail in conversion.) I shot some ducks on a river that was > offering some reflections of direct sunlight last weekend with the K-3 and > didn't experience any difficulty. So far, it seems as forgiving as the K-5 in > that regard. > > Paul >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- Boris -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
