Derby, I had the same impressions (both), as described by Godfrey.
As for specific photos, - I thought that the one on p.57 appeared a bit too dark. I especially liked photos on p.67 and 55. A rather strange pose on p.35 caught my attention. Please, excuse me, I will provide an additional comment about something that makes my eye a bit uncomfortable is the crop in some photos that cuts off some odd portion of the legs (feet). There is some magic formula of how much of a limb one can cut off so that it looks fine. I don't know how to formulate it, it's just how I feel. I actually remember seeing some website about a year ago that was discussing what portion works and what does not. Unfortunately, I don't remember where it was. Those are photos: 37, 61, 45, and to a lesser extent 57, 55, 51. Well, I just googled, and found this chart: http://img.gawkerassets.com/img/18i6o34ozkql8jpg/ku-xlarge.jpg on this page: http://lifehacker.com/5991733/avoid-amputating-people-in-your-photos-with-this-cropping-cheat-sheet I think it works along the lines (pun intended) of my intuition. Best regards, Igor Wed Nov 27 17:04:23 EST 2013 Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: Nicely done photos, sir! Like someone else intimated, it feels a little odd that you're using only one page out of two facing pages. The blank space on the left sometimes becomes a little overpowering.I want something to be there, even if it is just titling or simple graphic. G On Nov 27, 2013, at 2:24 AM, Derby Chang <derbyc at iinet.net.au> wrote: > I made a Blurb. There are probably a few more adjustments before I order, but > this is essentially what it will look like. > > http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/13/11/eyecontact/index.html > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
