I don´t care if my pictures are art or not. It doesn´t make them any better.
DagT 17. des. 2013 kl. 23:03 skrev Walt <ldott...@gmail.com>: > Of course my photos are art. And so is everything else I do if you leave it > to me to be the judge. > > -- Walt > > On 12/16/2013 8:45 AM, CollinB wrote: >> When a medium belongs exclusively to the artists then it remains an art >> form. >> But popularity, it seems, destroys art. (eg, the mobile went from an art >> form to a baby crib toy) >> Kodak is to blame for the change in photography and that was about a century >> ago. >> >> There is a remnant of photographic art. Some here do it quite well. Others >> of us just try hard. >> >> Art is more than the individualism of the eye of the beholder. >> Such pomo definitions destroy all meaning. >> Art is a rigorous creation, an image which speaks clearly. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
