Paul via phone
> On Jan 4, 2014, at 3:32 PM, Mark Roberts <[email protected]> wrote: > > Bruce Walker wrote: > >>> On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Mark Roberts <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> John wrote: >>> >>>> I think some are still under the mistaken impression that what you >>>> "NEED" permits you to tell me what I'm allowed to *want*. >>> >>> What's interesting to me is that this nontroversy is new to digital. >>> Back in the days of film I don't recall anyone who expressed interest >>> in buying a Pentax 67 or 645 being told they they didn't need that >>> much resolution or wouldn't print large enough to justify it. >> >> But that was well before the Internet and fanboyism. > > Um, no it wasn't. > Of course negative size and sensor size aren't the same thing. In theory, one can pack a lot of pixels on a sensor of modest size, whereas the size of the film is the size of the film. > -- > Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia > www.robertstech.com > > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
