I am not seeing what was the problem in what he did. The modification he did did not change the purpose of the photo or whatever the photo presents.
It brings back the question of what is and what is not "manipulation" of the photo. As "burning and dodging" is also image manipulation and modification. While I understand that one can defined the modification of an image when the actual pixels are replaced/moved. But what if he just darkened some portion of the photo with an object in it so that the object is deep in a shadow, and hence cannot be seen on the photo? That's not moving of the pixels, but just changing the levels on a part of the photograph. I understand the problem when a person is removed from a group photo, but that's totally different. I think in this particular case, they are making a mountain out of a molehill. Igor Thu Jan 23 13:11:02 EST 2014 Mark Roberts wrote: > http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-01-23/pulitzer-photographer-narciso-conteras-fired-syria-ap/5215200 -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
