I wonder if it was a conversation with D-a? At DFX, I took a bunch of shots with the 8mm fisheye, and I showed them to her, saying that I hadn't seen anybody else using fisheye for swing/blues dances. And she found your photos circa March of 2013, so I stood corrected.
I think some shots are quite interesting there. Shots from below (or above) have some better potential, specifically, ending in 35 56, maybe 127. What I think is important is that in most cases you need to choose the "main" object (as it is done in 904,346,701,035, 007, etc.), and concentrate on it. In most cases, "overview" does not work that well. I hope to get to work on my photos with the 8mm fisheye and show them here soon. Igor On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 4:35 AM, Larry Colen <lrc at red4est.com> wrote: > I was at a party at a friend's house tonight. She was telling me about a > conversation she'd had, and it prompted me to put together this little > gallery of dance photos. > > It's a shame that at f/3.5 my fisheye lens is so slow, because it can be > rather fun in the way it catches so much of the action in a small room. > > http://www.flickriver.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157640171166164/ > > -- > Larry Colen -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
