On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 10:17:16AM -0500, Bruce Walker wrote: > I bet a good night's sleep (and maybe an aspirin) will restore some > good humour and perspective to Larry. :-)
Sorry folks. I'm a bit stressed out over various things going on in my life, so I guess that after a long day my fuse was a little bit short. > > I've been forced recently to deal with the puzzle of how to publicly > publish image galleries with a degree of nudity in them. My > conclusion: put your gallery up on DropBox. I had to deal with dropbox for something for a friend once. It was a pain in the ass, but I suppose that it's better than using my own bandwidth to host things on my own server. > > > Each of the photography and art sites deals with nude and erotic > content differently but the most common method is to trap it behind a > wall that requires (a) sign-in and (b) individual viewers to opt-in to > displaying so-called "restricted" content. That applies to Flickr and > Behance. 500px will let a non-subscriber see a restricted image after > challenging him to click a disclaimer button. But free 500px accounts > cannot create galleries. It also occured to me that this way flickr can force people to get flickr accounts, using "dirty pictures" as an incentive. -- Larry Colen [email protected] http://red4est.com/lrc -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
