This review is worth a read too http://www.pentaxforums.com/reviews/pentax-16-50-vs-sigma-tamron-17-50mm/introduction.html
On 29 March 2014 11:41, steve harley <p...@paper-ape.com> wrote: > on 2014-03-28 12:09 CollinB wrote > >> Typo: DG. >> I'm hesitating since it's not the newer EX. >> Reviews are so-so. >> Still, it would be an improvement over the 18-55, but I'm questioning if >> it > > > fwiw, the Sigma 17-70 isn't on this list, but noting the position of the > Pentax 16-45, and the fact that a used 16-45 might be cheaper than the Sigma > 17-70, if 16-45 is a good range for you, consider it too > > <http://www.dxomark.com/Reviews/Best-lenses-for-the-24-MPix-Pentax-K-3-Recommended-primes-and-zooms/Best-zoom-lenses-for-the-Pentax-K-3> > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. -- Rob Studdert (Digital Image Studio) Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, Picasa: distudio -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
