When you are peeping, who cares about the pixels...

--
Bruce

Sent from my iPad

> On Apr 18, 2014, at 2:01 PM, Zos Xavius <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> But the pixels are there for peeping! :)
> 
>> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Bruce Walker <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I'm using a K-3 for portraits and it works great. I have never enabled
>> the anti-moire feature. More of my subjects have fabric on than not.
>> :-)
>> 
>> Actually, you can A-B it in one particular shoot: subject is wearing
>> fine fishnet in some shots but bare skin in the exact same pose and
>> light in others ("Alt.portraits of Madame X").
>> 
>> For me the fuss about moire with the K-3 or K-5IIs is overblown by
>> pixel-peepers and is not a practical real-world concern.
>> 
>> 
>>> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 4:15 PM, Zos Xavius <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> I'm actually considering a K-5 IIs right now and that's a real
>>> concern. The sharpness differences and fine detail differences between
>>> the k-5 II and IIs are undeniable though. I looked through a whole lot
>>> of real world, outdoors pictures and couldn't find much moire. I mean
>>> its there if you really look in spots, but it didn't jump out all over
>>> the place. With fabrics I might have problems. The Leica M9 has a
>>> lower pixel pitch and doesn't seem to produce moire everywhere, but
>>> I'm sure if you look at 100% it probably has some moire. I don't hear
>>> anyone complaining about the M9. I guess my big fear is portraits. The
>>> fabric samples on dpreview look scary. Should I just get another good
>>> old K-5 and call it a day? I'm curious if anyone out there is using a
>>> K-5 IIs for portraits and how that works for them.
>>> 
>>> --
>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>>> follow the directions.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> -bmw
>> 
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>> follow the directions.
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.
> 

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to