It does look good, and you could clone out the donut bokeh. Big glass without 
the big price. Not a bad equation.

Paul
On Apr 23, 2014, at 9:21 PM, Mark C <[email protected]> wrote:

> That shot looks pretty good - the doughnut bokeh is not apparent until 
> pointed out. It is a very small pic but the bird looks to be reasonably sharp.
> 
> On 4/23/2014 6:52 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
>> This was shot with it.
>> 
>> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1604247/PESO/PESO%20--%20theVictorII.html
>>  
>> 
>> You can end up with some gaud awful donut bokeh, and there was just a little 
>> of that in the final image. Contrast is a little low, though not as low as 
>> some lesser Mirror teles, and a number of zooms I've used.  On the other 
>> hand, there's a good amount of detail in well lighted subjects.  I thought 
>> that the image of the Cardinal was pretty good.  It would have been better 
>> but as I said in the Victor II post, course focusing was by ground glass, 
>> but I used the center sensor for fine focusing, and it picked the tiny 
>> branch in front of the bird not the bird itself.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 4/23/2014 5:12 PM, Charles Robinson wrote:
>>> On Apr 23, 2014, at 15:03 , P.J. Alling <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Ok, so not really a PESO per se.    It kind of feels /finally/ be able to 
>>>> use this lens on a camera with more or less modern image stabilization 
>>>> technology.  I was really looking forward to doing that on the K20D but 
>>>> only after receiving that body did Pentax's true treachery become apparent.
>>>> 
>>>> Lugging this around is a bit more discrete than a Canon 600mm L...
>>>> As an acquaintance is wont to say it's not long but it's sure big around.
>>>> 
>>>> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1604247/PESO/PESO%20--%20bigglass.html 
>>>> 
>>> How's the image quality?  I have a no-name 500mm mirror lens which is the 
>>> most god-awful, low-contrast, crap focus-quality thing I've ever owned.  
>>> I'm not sure why I haven't already dropped it in the driveway and run over 
>>> it a few times.  Worst $35 on a used lens I ever spent (20 years ago and 
>>> still not one usable image from it).
>>> 
>>>  -Charles
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Charles Robinson - [email protected]
>>> Minneapolis, MN
>>> http://charles.robinsontwins.org
>>> http://www.facebook.com/charles.robinson
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to