The ME S is, IMO, a great camera. I liken it to the Spotmatic of the M-series. I think it's so cheap because so many of them were made.
While the controls are, for me, a bit odd, in that one must push a couple of small buttons in order to change the shutter speed, every thing else about the camera seems ideal or close to it. The MX is more expensive because there are fewer of them around, and because they are considered more "professional" than the ME series cameras. Malcolm Smith wrote: > > I have seen a number of ME Super bodies, going for less than �50. When I > bought my MXs, they were quite a bit more expensive, but the MX has retained > its value, and MEs are cheapish - why? > > I was thinking of buying a body for my eldest son, who then has access to a > few lenses. Is this a good idea, or am I missing some information about this > camera? -- Shel Belinkoff mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/ http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/darkroom-rentals/index.html - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
