Such a rush of questions! I will take them one at a time. 1. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Not only that, but form follows function.
2. If there were nothing for the pigeons to stand on they'd have to fly everywhere, in which case they'd be albatrosses. 3. Stupidity would be not standing on it, and using it for purposes other than that for which it was designed. Lolling, for example. It would be unfathomably stupid if the pigeons lolled on it. 4. They illuminate our darkness in many ways. 5. The critters of this earth are not for our need, nor we for theirs, but they need us and we need them. Besides, if we ran out of pigeons, what would the pelicans in St. James's Park eat? B > On 27 May 2014, at 00:52, "Daniel J. Matyola" <[email protected]> wrote: > > That is an ugly device. Is it really needed? Are the pigeons that > stupid? (I have read they are actually quite bright.) Do we need > more pigeons? > > Dan Matyola > http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola > > >> On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Bob W <[email protected]> wrote: >> This is one: >> >> http://www.web-options.com/PigeonStand.jpg >> >> It keeps them safe from attack from both sides of the river bank, and the >> grey colour provides camouflage against most breeds of eagle. All they fear >> now are freshwater crocodiles with a spring in their step. >> >> B >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
