That is what I did.  I could not afford or justify the K3, but as my old K5 was 
worn beyond rated life expectancy,  I picked up the K5iis.  At that time the K3 
was $1300 and I got the K5iis for $700. 

--
Bruce

Sent from my iPad

> On Jul 11, 2014, at 10:40 AM, "J.C. O'Connell" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> well the main reason Im considering the K5 IIs is they are still available 
> new in box and cost only $700 compared to around $1100 for a K3.
> The K5 IIs seems to have gotten good reviews and is significantly cheaper 
> than a K3. Of course, its not the same as a K3, but it should be worth $700.
>> On 7/11/2014 1:26 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
>> Objective testing by various web sites and magazines have come to the 
>> consensus that there is a small but noticeable difference in sharpness, at 
>> the pixel level with a greater chance of noticeable moire.  Since most of us 
>> don't print at the pixel level, I wouldn't worry about it either way.  The 
>> K5II has much improved auto focus at lower light levels.  There's also some 
>> possibility that Ricoh put more effort into sourcing better components than 
>> Hoya so K-5(( cameras may have longer trouble free lifetimes than K-5 
>> cameras. That last is conjecture, and may or may not be important given the 
>> shortened life cycle of digital photo equipment, as the K-5 series is 
>> already obsolete as a product.
>> 
>>> On 7/11/2014 11:53 AM, J.C. O'Connell wrote:
>>> Im considering selling one of my lenses and buying a K5 II or IIs with the 
>>> funds but I am undecided because I dont know a couple of things about these 
>>> two bodies.
>>> 1. How much real sharpness difference do you really see between the II  and 
>>> IIs when using a really sharp lens?
>>> 2. How often and how much of a problem is moire with the IIs body using 
>>> really sharp lenses?
>>> Any guidance would be appreciated, and thanks in advance.
>>> P.S. 3. Could someone remind me what is the difference between a K5 and a 
>>> K5II?
>>> -- 
>>> J.C. O'Connell
>>> [email protected]
>>> --
> 
> 
> -- 
> J.C. O'Connell
> [email protected]
> --
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.
> 

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to