<<bangs head repeatedly against keyboard>>

On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 11:33 AM, Bryan Jacoby <bryan.jac...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The other side of the coin is that, to produce the same picture (same
> depth of field and shutter speed), the full frame camera will only be
> getting half as many photons per unit area, so has to shoot at 2x the
> ISO of the crop camera.  So the common wisdom that you get a stop
> extra ISO out of a full frame camera is true but misleading, because
> you _need_ a stop higher ISO on full frame to produce the same image
> as you would with an APS-C camera.
>
> On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Bryan Jacoby <bryan.jac...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 10:11 AM, Darren Addy <pixelsmi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> To try to find lenses that still give you that focal length and
>>> maximum aperture becomes an expensive proposition, when it is possible
>>> at all.
>>>
>>> Extreme example: DA* 200mm f2.8 can be bought for under $1K. (More
>>> like $700, used) 300mm equiv. FOV on APS-C
>>> Move to a full frame, now you need a 300mm f2.8 to replicate that FOV.
>>> Price one of those lately? A Sigma is $3400. A more reasonable choice
>>> would be a 300mm f4. You've replicated the FOV, but lost a full stop
>>> of light.
>>
>> Not really (I mean about losing the stop of light).  It's true that
>> f/4 on full frame will only produce an image half as bright on the
>> sensor compared to f/2.8 on APS-C, but that's half as bright in the
>> sense of photons per second _per unit area_.  The full frame sensor
>> has a little over twice the area, so it will actually be collecting
>> slightly more photons per second _over the whole image_, which is what
>> actually matters (or, another way to think of it is they will both get
>> the same number of photons per second per pixel if the two sensors
>> have the same number of pixels).    And a 300 f/4 on full frame would
>> have about the depth of field as the 200 f/2.8 on APS-C.  So these two
>> scenarios are actually very comparable.
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.



-- 
Photographers must learn not to be ashamed to have their photographs
look like photographs.
~ Alfred Stieglitz

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to