I don't either personally. A 10-17 would be a lot more interesting with its adjustable FE effect for about the same cost really IMO.
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 9:52 PM, JC OConnell <[email protected]> wrote: > these are interesting images but I dont see any "fisheye" effects at all > On 9/14/2014 7:52 PM, Darren Addy wrote: >> >> On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 6:44 PM, JC OConnell <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> fisheye lenses designed for full frame become bastards on aps digital. >>> jco >> >> Have you tried it? I disagree. >> You still get fisheye lines, but only the center crop from it, so it >> isn't as noticable as if they extend to the edges, as in a full frame. >> >> The effect is subtle, but can be quite pleasing: >> https://www.flickr.com/photos/pixelsmithy/4249410738/ >> https://www.flickr.com/photos/pixelsmithy/4248660978/ >> https://www.flickr.com/photos/pixelsmithy/4248010833/ >> >> I sold mine, but it is one of those lenses I plan to own again, even >> for use on APS-C. >> > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
