Yes.  On re-reading your note, I see that the LR export was THE LOW
QUALITY JPEG.
I suppose you tried less than a +5 exposure comp.
That might have saved you some work.
But the K-5 is a joy to work with.
Regards,  Bob S.

On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Charles Robinson <[email protected]> wrote:
> These images ARE produced from a RAW image.
>
> On Sep 29, 2014, at 17:36 , Bob Sullivan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> You ought to try that with a RAW image for best results.
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 1:11 PM, Don Guthrie <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> You know I like them both in their own way. The 1st one has a certain drama
>>> b&w high contrast. But I appreciate the information in the improved version
>>> which changes the subject to include the pool and people.
>>>
>>> On 9/29/14, 1:00 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Message: 3
>>>> Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 12:25:59 -0500
>>>> From: Charles Robinson<[email protected]>
>>>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List<[email protected]>
>>>> Subject: PESO: Washington Monument (and in praise of the dynamic range
>>>>        on the  K5)
>>>> Message-ID:<[email protected]>
>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>>>>
>>>> I can't say enough good things about what you can do with pulling up
>>>> detail from the shadows in the K5.
>>>>
>>>> Saturday night, the wife and I pedaled around Washington DC taking photos
>>>> of the monuments.  One shot I did, I figured "well, the contrast is too 
>>>> much
>>>> but I'll just expose for the brights and see what else I can get in post".
>>>>
>>>> So, I spot-metered on the Washington monument, and took this 13-second
>>>> exposure at f/9 and ISO 100.  As you can see, the image "straight out of 
>>>> the
>>>> camera" is not much to write home about:
>>>>
>>>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/cpbyheptagcykqj/K5__4359-original.jpg?dl=0
>>>>
>>>> However, in LR I did only two (very-drastic) adjustments:
>>>>
>>>>  1. I jammed the exposure slider all the way up (+5 stops)
>>>>  2. I pulled the highlights all the way down (-100)
>>>>
>>>> The result is this.  Not high art, but a good-enough documentation of what
>>>> I saw when I was there:
>>>>
>>>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/7djxrsj2pwcfl0e/K5__4359-processed.jpg?dl=0
>>>>
>>>> There is some mottling up in the sky due to it being a low-quality JPEG
>>>> export (and there's also a speck of dust on my darned sensor!) but still -
>>>> wow.
>>>>
>>>>  -Charles
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
>>> follow the directions.
>>
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>> follow the directions.
>>
>
>
>
>  -Charles
>
> --
> Charles Robinson - [email protected]
> Minneapolis, MN
> http://charles.robinsontwins.org
> http://www.facebook.com/charles.robinson
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to