Thanks, Attila, but I was shooting to keep the noise—that is, incorporate noise into the picture. Weird perhaps, but it was what I was experimenting for. :-). Cheers, Christine
> On Nov 7, 2014, at 12:52 PM, Attila Boros <[email protected]> wrote: > > That's not bad at all, and you can improve them with a quick noise > reduction in ACR / Lightroom. For even better results you could try > noise reduction on each channel individually in PS, but that's not > quick anymore. > > I like the first 2, nice framing! > > On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 8:44 PM, Christine Aguila <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Hi Everyone: >> >> On the way to Newberry Library the other night, I tried a few high ISO shots >> at 51,200—and in some cases added a bit of flash, which was dialed down to >> EV -2.00. The metadata is listed above each photo. >> >> There are five images here--(virtually as shot)— with a tarted up version >> that follows to make for a total of 10 images. Clearly, there is noise, but >> I have to say, I was still surprised with the quality given the ISO. I plan >> to do more experimentation—kind of fun. >> >> http://www.caguila.com/highiso/index.html >> >> Cheers, Christine >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
