Actually it should be 'who'. It's the subject of the clause; only if it were 
the object would it be 'whom'. But whom cares, eh?

B



> On 18 Nov 2014, at 00:20, Jeffery Johnson 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Okay it appears that should be whom and not human. I am shocked no one 
> pointed this out to me :)
> 
> Jeffery Johnson
> Photo Captures by Jeffery <http://www.photocapturesbyjeffery.com>
> http://www.Facebook.com/photocapturesbyjeffery
> https://twitter.com/PhotoCaptures
> Bringing joy and happiness to lonely and depressed walls across the nation 
> with wonderful eclectic photography and Pet photo sessions for an array of 
> pets and their families.
> 
>> On 11/16/2014 7:55 PM, Jeffery Johnson wrote:
>> Received good news on last weeks visit to the Nashville Zoo. Three of the 
>> female Red Kangaroos are with joeys and one, Ima, had hers some what making 
>> an appearance. Though with all this cold weather we are currently having 
>> won't get to see if by chance it is making more of a show. Hoping Saturday 
>> will be warm enough for them to be out and about.
>> 
>> Red kangaroo Ima hoping joey will come out of pouch
>> http://www.photocapturesbyjeffery.com/p738035333/e35116875
>> 
>> It appears that Jimmy most likely is the father to all three. They won't 
>> know until a year or so as that is when they can see through DNA as to human 
>> fathered the joeys.
>> 
>> Red Roo Jimmy head tilted back
>> http://www.photocapturesbyjeffery.com/p738035333/e36780558
> 
> 

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to