Thanks. Having had no exposure to either series, I was curious as to why one would select one over the other.
Otis Aaron Reynolds wrote: > On Thursday, April 18, 2002, at 11:46 AM, Otis Wright, Jr. wrote: > > > Now that you mention it. What requirements are served by the 645 family > > better > > than the 6x7 family and vice versa..........? > > Well, the 67 is better when you need or want a bigger negative, or when > you require different finders/prisms. > > The 645 is better when you need AE (though the 67II now does aperture > priority), a motor drive, a lighter and smaller body, and quicker > reloading (pre-loadable inserts). If you need AF, you need the 645n or > 645nII. > > So basically, you can work more quickly and with a lighter kit with 645, > but the trade off is negative size. > > -Aaron > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
