HERES PLUS X:
Image Structure
The data in this section is based on development in KODAK HC-110 Developer
(Dilution B), 70�F  (21�C), 5 minutes in a large tank, with manual agitation
at 1-minute intervals.

Resolving Power
 Diffuse rms Granularity*

ISO RPL TOC 1.6:1)
 ISO RPL TOC 1000:1)

50
 125
 10 (extremely fine)

As you can see from the numbers, plusX has the same exact
specs as TMAX 400, but its only 1/3 as fast!
JCO
======================================================

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of J. C. O'Connell
> Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 12:31 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Tmax 100 and the 67
>
>
> From kodak:
> Image Structure
> The data in this section are based on development in KODAK Developer D-76,
> at 68�F (20�C).
>
> KODAK PROFESSIONAL Film
>  Resolving Power[a]
>  Diffuse rms Granularity[b]
>
> T-MAX 100
>  63 lines/mm (TOC 1.6:1)
>  8
>
> 200 lines/mm (TOC 1000:1)
>
>
>
>
> T-MAX 400
>  50 lines/mm (TOC 1.6:1)
>  10
>
> 125 lines/mm (TOC 1000:1)
>
> =====================================================================
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of J. C. O'Connell
> > Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 12:26 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: Tmax 100 and the 67
> >
> >
> > > Subject: Re: Tmax 100 and the 67
> > >
> > >
> > > I shot some TMAX 100 in my 6x7 and was not overwhelmed. Under my 25X
> > > grain magnifier, the grain was undefined and difficult to
> focus. I much
> > > prefer Plux-X for a low speed, fine grain film. With Plux-X
> the grain is
> > > minimal, but it's defined. I do like TMAX 400 in the 6x7. Perhaps I'll
> > > try the 100 again, but my first few rolls were not pleasing.
> To each his
> > > own.
> > What convinced me to try TMAX 100 in the 67 was the exceptional
> > results I got lately using it for 35mm. The grain is definately
> > finer than the TMAX 400 and its just as sharp if not sharper
> > than the tmax 400. Maybe its the way I develop it. 6.5 minutes,
> > tmax 1:9, constant agitation, 75 deg. F. I seem to get a little
> > more contrast with the TMAX 400 than I do with the 400, maybe
> > thats why it seems sharper.If I remember Kodaks spec sheets
> > correctly , the tmax 100 has higher resolving power than the 400.
> > JCO
> > -
> > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
> > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
> > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
> -
> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Reply via email to