I replaced my FA 100-300 with the 55-300 WR over the summer and have
been very happy with the results.
At 6:12 PM +0200 12/13/14, Alan C wrote:
Yes, I agree. I'm saving for one to replace my FA 100-300mm.
Alan C
-----Original Message----- From: Paul Stenquist
Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2014 6:02 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Tele for K-3?
Jack Davis has gotten some excellent results shooting birds with the 50-300.
Paul
On Dec 13, 2014, at 9:24 AM, Ralf R Radermacher <[email protected]> wrote:
I'm still looking for a tele lens for my K-3. Seems like my trusted
old Pentacon 4/300 mm has become heavier over the years and it's
optical quality is no longer as good with the K-3's 24 MPix sensor
as it was with my previous cameras. Looks like we're both getting
old...
Something around 300 mm would be nice but the 1000 euros for the DA
4/300 are a lot of money for a lens that I won't be using that
often.
Is the 50 - 300 mm sensibly better between 50 and 200 than the 50 -
200 kit lens and how good is it at the long end?
Any other suggestions?
Ralf
--
The Office Gallery - Scenic and Landscape Photography by Steve Sharpe
24 Maple Avenue
Ellershouse NS
B0N 1L0
[email protected]
http://earth.delith.com/photo_gallery.html
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
