I don't think its ever a good time. Worst case they perform admirably on the A7.
On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 8:15 PM, J C OConnell <[email protected]> wrote: > with rumours of a FF Pentax dslr coming soon, doesnt seem like a good time > to unload FF lenses. > > On 12/13/2014 6:01 PM, Henk Terhell wrote: >> >> Ralf, >> Don't know about the DA 2.4/35, but there are data on the M 2/35 and FA >> 2/35 on Yoshihiko's site >> http://www.takinami.com/yoshihiko/photo/lens_test/pentax_35.html >> The FA 2/35 is one of my favorite lens so I have no need for the DA >> version. >> >> Henk >> >> Ralf R Radermacher schreef op 13-12-2014 om 15:16: >>> >>> Hello all, >>> >>> I'm thinking about replacing my trusted M 2/35 mm through a AF lens. A >>> look at Bojidar's website has taught me that the M has 7 elements in 7 >>> groups while the FA and DA versions both have 6 elements in 5 groups where >>> one is an aspherical element. >>> >>> Is there anyone who's ever been able to compare any two of all three of >>> them? How similar are the FA and DA versions optically? >>> >>> I'm quite happy with the M's optical quality but my eyes aren't as good >>> anymore as they used to be and focussing is getting a little difficult. >>> >>> Ralf >>> >> >> > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
