Can the Epson deal with underexposed negatives or transparencies?
I've photographed several old, B+W family pictures with my DSLRs and have
been able to bring out details that were not apparent in the original
print - digital magic !
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
----- Original Message -----
From: "Malcolm Smith" <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: An odd question about copyright and copying old B&W pictures.
Paul Stenquist wrote:
All of the prints for this article were scanned on my Epson V500. And
it’s not even the top of the Epson line. Epson flatbeds are excellent.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/79914167/That%20Kid%20From%20Chicag
o.pdf
Great article too, I love the 66/67 Charger in particular.
Can the Epson deal with underexposed negatives or transparencies? I have a
number I took in the late '70s (just before I bought my first Pentax) that
have the detail there, but you need to compensate to bring the detail out.
I expected to convert them to a digital image with a DSLR, simply because
I could play about with exposure etc. I'd like to do as much as possible
in camera/scanner before post-processing.
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
