I'm with Mark. If anything is "fugly" it is the hump on the K-3 that is basically just for a headphone jack. But it isn't anything to get in a kerfuffle over. Form follows function. The only design problem I ever had with Pentax was their weird prism housing on the K-30 with looks like some Neanderthal brow. Frankly, even the K-01 was better looking than that. Still, if it has good image quality and ergonomics, the "looks" are less than important.
“What we see depends mainly on what we look for.” ― John Lubbock On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Mark Roberts <[email protected]> wrote: > Miserere wrote: > >>I'm with you, Cotty; I found it fugly as hell. >> >>Did they fire the K-3/5/7 designers? > > Odd. I really like the look of the new camera. > > -- > Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia > www.robertstech.com > > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- Life is too short to put up with bad bokeh. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
