If you figure this all out, Bruce. Please let us know. :) Jack
----- Original Message ----- From: "Malcolm Smith" <[email protected]> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, February 23, 2015 11:30:52 PM Subject: RE: OT more on Peter Lik Bruce Walker wrote: > So is Lik's work resellable for a lot of money? Apparently, not so > much. > > http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/22/business/peter-liks-recipe-for- > success-sell-prints-print-money.html I quite like the image talked about here, although not for the sum involved. He thinks the sun brightly shines from his behind, but it's his marketing skills which impress me more than his art. I once walked past a London gallery that had a building skip outside, ready for collection. An eyesore on the street, but if it had been placed as a main exhibit within the gallery, no doubt some would have considered it art. What is art anyway; I'm in no position to judge as the parameters of definition seem as slippery as catching eels with greased rubber gloves. I'm fairly certain you don't improve art by simply raising the price tag - but then again... Malcolm -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
