I'm only a few days ahead of you, Rick, and I know I needed a head start.
:)

On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Rick Womer <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks! I feel marginally smarter now.
> http://photo.net/photos/RickW
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 12:00 AM, Darren Addy <[email protected]> wrote:
>> A "full spectrum" conversion removes the low pass IR filter/AA filter
>> sandwich that sits in front of your camera's sensor. It is replaced
>> with a clear "window" (the quality of which is normally what makes the
>> real price difference between conversions). Once that is done, your
>> sensor is open to whatever filter you put in the optical path. That
>> filter could be on the front of the lens (as we normally think of
>> photographic filters) or it could be behind the lens, in the body.
>>
>> They can be used for Infrared Photography. Depending upon the
>> wavelengths you let through, you can get various looks of IR imagery:
>> http://procamerarepair.3dcartstores.com/Infrared-Sample-Photos_ep_69.html
>>
>> They can be used for UV Photography:
>> http://www.ultravioletphotography.com/content/
>>
>> Or they can be used for "narrowband" photography, which is the main
>> thing I want one for. As you guessed, that involves astrophotography.
>> Moonlight and city lights/street lights can interfere with ordinary
>> imaging. But with a full spectrum camera you can put a narrowband
>> filter (like a Hydrogen Alpha filter) in the light path and photograph
>> very faint objects (that emit Ha) even in (what would otherwise be)
>> the glare of the moon or light pollution.
>> http://www.astropix.com/HTML/I_ASTROP/DSLR_HA.HTM
>>
>> This is a beautiful and educational video, if you are interested in a
>> good explaination of narrowband astrophotography:
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E842Rs-iB2I
>>
>> It is still possible to use a full spectrum camera for regular
>> photography of one puts the UV/IR low pass filter (that was in front
>> of the sensor) in front of the lens again. I also read that this can
>> be done (without a filter) with a custom white balance, but I'm more
>> interested in using the full spectrum camera for the "weird" stuff and
>> using an unmodified camera for photography as God intended.
>> :)
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 7:21 PM, Richard Womer <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Stupid Question Department: What's a full spectrum camera? Is it for
>>> astrophotography?
>>> http://photo.net/photos/RickW
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 1:00 AM, Larry Colen <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> I had mine done at pro camera repair in San Diego.  I don't think that they
>>>> removed the AA filter, you could ask them yourself:
>>>> http://www.procamerarepair.com/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Darren Addy wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Greetings,
>>>>> I'm considering saving my nickels to get my K-01 converted to a full
>>>>> spectrum camera. If I'm not mistaken there are a few on the PDML that
>>>>> have gone this route.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm not clear on whether BOTH IR-Cut filter and the AA filter is
>>>>> removed as part of the process. With a Canon these are essentially
>>>>> sandwiched together (at least the Canon Digital Rebel XSi (450D), XS
>>>>> (1000D), T1i (500D)&  T2i (550D) according to this page:
>>>>> http://dslrmodifications.com/rebelmod450d4.html
>>>>> This page has an illustration (a ways down) of a similar look at the
>>>>> K-5 II and I'm assuming that is similar to the K-01
>>>>> http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/pentax-k5-ii/pentax-k5-iiA.HTM
>>>>>
>>>>> Those of you that have had Full Spectrum conversion done, do you know
>>>>> what material was used as the clear window in your conversion?
>>>>>
>>>>> If your converted camera has Live View, I'm curious as to whether
>>>>> there is enough light to focus with an IR filter (or some such) in the
>>>>> optical path and using Live View. If that is possible, then I think
>>>>> that the K-01 is an excellent candidate for putting a filter inside
>>>>> the body (no mirror to worry about).
>>>>>
>>>>> I also *just* discovered that you can use the PC/AV OUT on the K-01 like
>>>>> this:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/138-pentax-k-01/227354-probs-med-k-01-life-view-ext-tv.html#post2420487
>>>>> That example is using video recording to make its point and I've just
>>>>> sent the poster a question to see if it works with Focus Peaking on
>>>>> still shots as well. If so, I'd like to get an external LCD monitor to
>>>>> aid in focusing for astrophotography. Or maybe just figure out how to
>>>>> hook it up to a laptop? I'm sorta dumb about these adapter questions.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Larry Colen  [email protected] (postbox on min4est)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
>>>> follow the directions.
>>>
>>> --
>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>>> follow the directions.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Life is too short to put up with bad bokeh.
>>
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>> follow the directions.
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.



-- 
Life is too short to put up with bad bokeh.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to