I would think resolution is a negligible difference. Unless it's extremely low res it's pretty easy to determine what is in focus and what is not.
Paul via phone > On Mar 8, 2015, at 3:52 PM, steve harley <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 2015-03-07 12:03 , John Francis wrote: >> >> The basic problem is you have three defining factors to consider. They are: >> >> 1) The size of the subject you are tring to capture >> >> 2) The size of the final image you are trying to create >> >> 3) How far away from the subject you can place the sensor > > doesn't the resolution of the film or sensor figure in? > > in other words, assume system A can resolve details to 0.01 mm on its film or > sensor, and system B can only resolve 0.02 mm details … won't the effective > depth of field be larger on system B, simply because with its lower > resolution you can see less difference between perfectly focused and slightly > out-of-focus details? > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
