Could very well be, Jack. :-) 

Den 15. mars 2015 13:15:51 CET, skrev Jack Davis <[email protected]>:
>I think the term of your subordinate period is a factor. ;-))
>
>Jack
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Jostein Øksne" <[email protected]>
>To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]>
>Sent: Sunday, March 15, 2015 4:41:16 AM
>Subject: Re: OT - in anticipation
>
>Can't say I got active endorsement when I bought mine, but we're still
>married too.
>
>I assume the trick must be to get married first. :-) 
>Jostein 
>
>Den 10. mars 2015 04:38:28 CET, skrev Ken Waller
><[email protected]>:
>>>>You can't be married if you have a lens that big. <G>
>>
>>I guess I'm an exception to that.
>>
>>Several years ago, at the insistance of my wife, I purchased, new my
>>600mm 
>>f4 FA lens.
>>
>>We're still married.
>>
>>
>>Kenneth Waller
>>http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
>>
>>----- Original Message ----- 
>>From: "Mark Roberts" <[email protected]>
>>Subject: Re: OT - in anticipation
>>
>>
>>> Jack Davis wrote:
>>>
>>>>You can't be married if you have a lens that big. <G>
>>>
>>> Not for long, anyway...
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia
>>> www.robertstech.com

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to