On 15/04/2015 6:13 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Bill wrote:

On 15/04/2015 6:04 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Regardless of the legality, I think taking photos of people under
specific conditions, like portraiture, under which the clients have
perfectly reasonable, fixed assumptions of the purpose and intended
use of the photos, and then using the photos for something else is a
pretty shitty thing to do. So I wouldn't do it.

When I was in the wedding game, my contract had a clause that I would be
able to use their pictures in my portfolio.
It was one of the must agree to clauses in my contract.

That's pretty reasonable.


I'm Canadian.
What else would you expect?

bill

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to