The 16-45 is an outstanding value. It shoots much better than it looks or feels. You will like it.
Paul via phone > On May 30, 2015, at 6:33 PM, Mark C <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm sure you'll be happy with your selection, Eric - it's an excellent lens. > > Mark > > On 5/30/2015 2:58 PM, Eric Weir wrote: >>> On May 16, 2015, at 9:56 AM, Eric Weir <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Thanks again to all who responded to my request for input regarding wide >>> angle zooms. FWIW,regarding them, I’m leaning toward the pentax 16-45/4 or >>> the new sigma 17-40/2.8. The latter is especially attractive, though more >>> expensive, but within my range. >> I ended up getting the pentax 16-45/4, primarily because it is available >> used inexpensively. My preference would have been the sigma 17-40/2.8. It >> may become an option down the road. >> >> Thanks again for all who responded to my request for input. >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Eric Weir >> Decatur, GA USA >> [email protected] >> >> "What does it mean...that the world is so beautiful?" >> >> - Mary Oliver > > > --- > This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus > protection is active. > http://www.avast.com > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
