Malcolm Smith wrote:
Larry Colen wrote:
Thanks. The most important thing is to shoot in manual and watch your
histogram. It would be nice if Lightroom allowed a bit more adjustment
in terms of temperature and tint, but you can extend it a bit by
tweaking the slope/end point of the tone curve for specific channels.
Another thing to keep in mind is to lean harder on the ISO than you
think you can get away with. I realized after the fact that 7568-7591
were shot at ISO 8000.
Noted. I'm glad you mention the use of higher ISO; so many publications say
how poor images become - often beyond 1600 - but the truth is modern DSLRs
are frankly astonishing way above that, and as proved in your set.
Between the K-5 sensor and lightroom's noise reduction, you can get
pretty amazing results. I don't know if you know the trick of using the
fluidr interface rather than the flickriver or flickr, but it shows the
exif data next to the image:
http://www.fluidr.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157654927530252/
There is one frame at 1250, two at 2000 and the rest are 2500-8000.
I have lost many more photos due to slow shutter speed or missed
focus/insufficient depth of field than I have to too high of an ISO.
Malcolm
--
Larry Colen [email protected] (postbox on min4est)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
