Forgive me for being so blunt. I'm enjoying a concoction of absinthe
and maple syrup this fine Sunday afternoon. It seem to make me
unsociably honest in my critiques.
:\
:/

On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 2:35 PM, Darren Addy <[email protected]> wrote:
> Very neat image of the Monarch Butterfly caterpillers, but I
> (strongly) agree with Ann: The measure of a good macro lens is NOT how
> it renders the "in focus" plane (they are virtually ALL great at that)
> but how it renders the Out Of Focus plane (the bokeh). The bokeh is
> what separates the "men" from the "boys" in macro lenses. What lens
> was this taken with? I tend to call bokeh that looks like that
> "weird-ass bokeh". Some people like it. I do not.
>
> On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 1:53 PM, Toine <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Maybe that's possible. I think I'll give it a try tonight.
>>
>>
>> On 28 June 2015 at 20:41, Jack Davis <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Toine,
>>> Love the crisp caterpillars. (no!..not for lunch) A quality image!!
>>> A clone tool moment would do away with the light blob near the center top. 
>>> A significant distraction.
>>>
>>> J
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Toine" <[email protected]>
>>> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]>
>>> Sent: Sunday, June 28, 2015 10:55:57 AM
>>> Subject: Re: PESO: Dinner for two
>>>
>>> Blurring the background would be difficult if I want the keep the
>>> catterpillars hairs untouched. I don't like working in PS, only if I
>>> can't manage it in Lightroom.
>>>
>>> On 28 June 2015 at 19:47, ann sanfedele <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> creamier bokeh -would- be nice, but the guests are just right... pretty
>>>> easy, I think, to
>>>> blur the background more in PS and worth the effort to get it from nice 
>>>> shot
>>>> to really nice shot :-)
>>>>
>>>> ann
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 6/28/2015 11:27 AM, Toine wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> For those interested in naming the two dinner guests: Caterpillars of
>>>>> Water Betony, Shargacucullia scrophulariae, I had to look it up in my
>>>>> field guide.
>>>>>
>>>>> MX-1 @ 6mm which equals 28mm at fullframe. So this is a wide angle
>>>>> macro! Forgot to set the apreture to full open for a creamier bokeh...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.repiuk.nl/content/helmkruidvlinder/lightbox/
>>>>>
>>>>> Toine
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
>>>> follow the directions.
>>>
>>> --
>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>>> follow the directions.
>>>
>>> --
>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>>> follow the directions.
>>
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>> follow the directions.
>
>
>
> --
> Life is too short to put up with bad bokeh.



-- 
Life is too short to put up with bad bokeh.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to