You are correct, of course. What caught my eye was the water, with all its ripples, stripes, the beautiful blue. I thought of the bird as sort of "punctuation". Essential but not part of the core meaning (if thst makes sense).
Thanks for the nice comment. Cheers, frank On 23 August, 2015 3:23:01 PM EDT, Mark C <[email protected]> wrote: >I like it - the bird is so small it can barely be considered the >"subject" of the image and the watery scene takes that honor, but the >bird is a great center of interest that the eye keeps going back to. > >On 8/20/2015 10:34 PM, frank theriault wrote: >> I think this could have worked in the PUG Minimalist Gallery last >month: >> >> http://knarfdummyblog.blogspot.ca/2015/08/minimalist-grebe.html >> >> But alas, I only took last weekend. >> >> BTW, I took my camera with me and actually snapped a few yesterday. >> They all sucked real hard. No PUG photo again this month, I'm >> afraid... LOL >> >> Hope you enjoy. Comments welcome. >> >> cheers, >> frank >> > > >--- >This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. >https://www.avast.com/antivirus -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
