Thanks, good to know. How is precision settling in? On September 20, 2015 9:16:01 AM EDT, Paul Stenquist <[email protected]> wrote: >Definitely worth fixing. In my experience the replacement motors are >much less likely to fail, and you can't get a lens as good as the 16-50 >for the price of the repair. > >Paul via phone > >> On Sep 20, 2015, at 8:14 AM, Larry Colen <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> David J Brooks wrote: >>> same thing when i went to buy the 17-70 Pentax version. Very slow >>> focus then it would work then it would not wor. Both samples failed >so >>> i went with Sigma so far so ghood >> >> The sigma 18-35 is looking very tempting right now. Unfortunately, >the 16-50 is my only weather sealed lens. >> >> -- >> Larry Colen [email protected] (postbox on min4est) >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above >and follow the directions.
-- Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
