P.J. Alling wrote: > You know it's funny, I hadn't thought about this in a long time, but: > It was always touted that you paid more for a modern digital camera > than an equivalent film camera, up front, and saved on the cost of > processing the film over time. It just occurred to me that I spent > more in both nominal and inflation adjusted terms on my last purchased > Pentax LX during the film era, than I did for my K-5II, true I bought > both used, but still price per frame shot is much lower with the K-5II > in fact it's essentially free, almost literally.
More practical today as well, but having used an LX recently, not as much fun. You can't have everything. Malcolm -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
